Equal footing View

December 15, 2008 in Life

This is a series of blog posts concerning youth participation. The articles will be published every Tuesdays in the coming 6 weeks. The last one was published on 25th Nov 2008.

There are many youth participation models adopted by different churches. The most interesting thing is how the church leadership perceives their youth would have tremendous effect on what kinds of model they will use.

 

  The following models/views are not meant to serve as an example for churches to adopt. The major intention to illustrate them is to facilitate a comparison between different models that are commonly used. Those models may be oversimplified but it will help one to understand what kinds of youth participation model her church is using.

 

A list of views of youth and its resulted participation models:

  1. Equal footing
  2. General Secretary in Training
  3. Lost Sheep
  4. Seeds

Equal footing View

 

        In a morning service, you are invited to pray for the children and young people at the point they will be going to their children/youth groups. What would the most possible version of your prayer?

 

  1. Pray that God will provide the teachers with wisdom; and the kids and youth will learn more about god.
  2. Pray that the children will pay attention, behave themselves and understand the teachings.
  3. Pray that the youth and kids will have a good time worshipping and learning about god.
  4. Pray that God will guide both the teacher and the youth/kids and will learn together new things and build a closer relationship with god.

 

        ‘Youth have so much to learnt from the elders but also the elders have much to learn from them’. If your answer is D, you are very likely in line with this view.

 

        With the ‘equal footing’ view, youths are not seen as kids but the peers or partners of the elders in various ministries. The youths can enjoy equal terms and opportunities in most aspects, including the right to participate in the highest level of decision making process.

 

        Churches with this view are most likely to carry out what has been called on in the last LWF Assembly: to urge all member churches to encourage the participation of youth in the worship and decision making processes at all levels.

 

        It is interesting to note that some of the churches which embrace this view do not intend to build a prominent youth ministry. There is not even a youth worker especially for taking care of the youth groups.

 

        Those churches would rather call on all adult members to serve as a ‘youth workers’. To be more accurate, those ‘youth workers’ will be more like ‘youth mentors’ in the beginning and become ‘partners’ in the end.

 

        The rationale behind this is that youth should not be seen as a group of ‘kids’ which needs extra attention to be taken care of. Rather they believe the youths have all kinds of potential to serve God as good as the elders are able to. Perhaps they may need a period of guidance in the beginning, but they can pick up soon and becomes an ‘equal footing’ partners of the elders.

 

        As such, those church will deliberately engage everyone of the youth into different ministries, from a choir to an advocacy group, according to the gifts of the respective young person.

 

        In many cases youth would still have a regular fellowship but it will more like a place to worship and communicate than the ‘only place’ for youth participation.

 

        The above description should be seen as a kind of extreme case of churches holding this view. More often, the churches would still have a youth ministry which organizes a variety of program, from bible studies camps to leadership empowerment programs.

 

        Nonetheless, those aim of those training are meant to empower the youth to soon become the partner of the elders in the ministry. Youths are not expected or required to take a very long period of training before they could actually take up the responsibility. The equal footing approach emphasizes very much on intergenerational partnership in the ‘present tense’.

 

African churches call for stronger Youth Participation

December 12, 2008 in Africa, Church, Ecumenism, Faith, HIV/Aids, Justice, LWF, Youth, Youth Ministry, Youth participation

Currently, many African churches meet at the Assembly of the All Africa Conference in Maputo, Mozambique. They came together and issued a convenant today addressing pressing issues for the African churches. Already, the second item of the 9 point convenant is calling for stronger youth participation. The entire document is worth reading but here I quote the youth section in full:

Covenant Two: Youth and Children in the Renewal of Africa

We recognize that the wisdom of the old and the strength of the youth and children are required for God’s mission in Africa. But we also realize that current mission environments in many of our churches do not bode well in allowing the youth and children to participate in God’s mission to redeem a broken and sinful world. Apparently, African youth and children are battling with the challenges brought by a highly technological world, human trafficking, drugs, HIV/Aids, violence in wars, etc. In addressing the problems of the continent, we must decide to live with a sense of collective responsibility, humbly dismantling the ecclesiastical structures that have long excluded the youth from the mission in the church. Together with the youth, the churches can take responsibility for the present and future renewal of the ecclesia and the entire continent.

Response

We acknowledge God’s endowments on the youth and children regardless of their age or status in life.

We affirm the youth and children as veritable partners in God’s mission in the renewal of Africa.

We commit ourselves to the dismantling of the ecclesiastical structures that have long excluded the young from mission in the church and society.

We commit ourselves to youth and children empowerment for effective leadership through capacity building, African education systems and curriculum, youth innovation and entrepreneurship.

Africa, step forth in faith!”

I think this is a very relevant statement and we should all work together to follow it up. Without any doubt, it is also very relevant for all other regions. I would be happy to hear your ideas!

We don’t want to destroy and rebuild

December 10, 2008 in Church, Life, Youth, Youth Ministry, Youth participation

This is a series of blog posts concerning youth participation. The articles will be published every Tuesdays in the coming 6 weeks. The last one was published on 25th Nov 2008.

         In reality, it is common to see that youth participation has always been seen as a revolutionary or even an ‘ungodly’ term. My observation told me that in a number of occasions when the term ‘youth participation’ is raised, it was as if a problem to be avoided than a commendable idea to be favored.

         A Lutheran youth worker once put it this way, ‘It [youth participation] has been an ongoing battle for decades [between the elders and the youths], I am afraid it will continue until the second coming of our Lord’.

         Indeed in some cases, when the youths’ hunger for wider participation meet with the elders’ hunger for absolute power, serious intergenerational conflict arises and threaten the unity in the church.

         For many youth I have encountered, their primary motives to participate in a particular church structure, e.g. a church council, is as simple as to get their voices heard and their interests being taken care of.

         However, some perceptions suggest that when youth were allowed to take part in the decision making process, they tend to radically push for their agenda. In some cases it may be right, but do not forget even so the youth are still the minority in the decision making body.

         The ‘danger’ of engaging the ‘radical youth’ has been a popular reason for impeding youth participation. It is always framed as for the sake of unity. Some churches would prefer a consultative approach rather than directly ‘granting’ youth for a vote.

         All those intergenerational conflicts, both due to power struggles and disagreement on certain issues, may be avoided if youth are being totally excluded from the decision making process. At least for some churches, it seems to work quite well.

         Those churches, however, could not see that excluding youth could be disastrous to the health of a church. When they see their youth suffered from lack of affiliation, undefined identity, passive spirituality, timid to new challenges and responsibility, etc. As such, it may not be exaggerated to say stagnant growth in some churches were partly due to lack of youth participation. But then youth becomes the scapegoat and are often blamed as lack of passion.

         In a book called ‘Youth A Part’, a youth worker Denis Tully wrote, ‘Young people do not want to destroy and rebuild, neither are they intent on being given everything. Rather their desire is to have an experience of the church which is meaningful to them and to walk a pilgrim journey with either their peers and or other adults.’

60 years Universal Declaration of Human Rights – but nothing to celebrate…

December 9, 2008 in Church, Justice, Latin America/Carribean, UN

A contribution by Julia Heyde from Germany:

A few days ago, lawyer Alirio Uribe Muñoz from Colombia visited Hamburg and I had the chance to meet him. He is a very friendly, approachable man who has been engaged in the defense of human rights for a very long time. With his lawyers’ association “José Alvear Restrepo” in Bogotá he works mostly with the victims of civil war in Colombia; he often defends journalists and unionists.

The greatest problem faced by Colombia right now, Muñoz said, is the high number of internally displaced people. One tenth of the Colombian population has been displaced, that means, that after Sudan Colombia has the highest number of internally displaced persons in the world.

“Right now we have to protect the people. That is the only thing we can do. Because in short-term we don’t see any possibilities for political negotiation or humanitarian agreements. There is probably no chance that this government will change its policy”, Muñoz commented.

Another problem is impunity. Read the rest of this entry →